During what has already proven to be a very busy month for federal labor law, the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) is poised to implement yet another pivotal change. On August 8, 2023, DOL announced it will soon publish a rule that, among other things, changes the prevailing wage calculation for federally-funded construction projects—a decision that departs from 40 years of precedent. The new rule goes into effect 60 days after it is formally published in the federal Register.

Background

All federally-funded construction projects are governed by the Davis-Bacon Act, which was passed by Congress in 1931. The Davis-Bacon Act requires contractors and subcontractors working on federally-funded construction projects to pay their workers the same prevailing wages as provided to similarly-situated workers in the relevant geographic area. DOL’s Wage and Hour Division collects and analyzes wages across classifications of workers in a given area and, from that data, determines the prevailing wage for each classification. Where a majority of workers in a certain classification are not paid a single prevailing wage, DOL establishes calculations that can be used to set the prevailing wage for that given group.

Changes to Calculation of Prevailing Wages in DOL’s Proposed Rule

Since 1983, DOL has used the “weighted average” calculation to determine the prevailing wage where a majority of workers in a classification are not paid a single prevailing wage. The weighted average calculation takes the total amount of wages from all individuals in the classification and divides that amount by the number of workers in that classification. The resulting average becomes the prevailing wage.

DOL’s proposed rule seeks to revert to a calculation methodology that was first implemented in 1935—known as the “30% rule.” The 30% rule calculates the prevailing wage based on the wage that is paid to at least 30% of workers in the classification for the geographic region. In a recent statement, the White House explained that the weighted average rule tended to “pull down the prevailing wage if some employers pay very little” and the 30% rule “makes it more likely that workers are paid a true prevailing wage.”

Additional Changes: Recordkeeping, Survey Processes, Enforcement

DOL’s new rule also includes some additional changes, including new processes for surveying outdated wage rates and stringent recordkeeping requirements forcing, requiring employers to maintain payroll records, employee phone numbers and email addresses for at least three years after work is completed.

The new proposed rule also increases DOL’s ability to enforce payment to employees who have lost wages due to retaliation-based termination or discipline. The proposed rule not only expands existing liability-assumption requirements, making contractors responsible for the compliance of their subcontractors regardless of intent, but also imposes a new requirement on “upper-tier” subcontractors to pay back wages due from “lower-tier” subcontractors, if they acted with knowledge or recklessness in violating the law.

Takeaways

With respect to the proposed change to the methodology of prevailing wage calculations, while this may appear to be a mere technical adjustment, it likely will have dramatic effects on the construction industry. According to the White House, this paradigm shift will put “thousands of extra dollars per year” in the pockets of “one million construction workers”—a result that will require contractors and subcontractors to pay a significantly greater price for labor.

Additionally, by focusing on only 30% of the relevant market, this new rule could have the effect of favoring certain wage rates while ignoring the remaining 70% of the market that may be paid less.

Finally, while DOL’s new rule does not impact the methodology of prevailing wage calculations under state and city prevailing wage laws, it is uncertain whether this dramatic change in federal methodology will influence states and localities. 

We will continue to keep you apprised of any other developments on this important topic.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Paul Salvatore Paul Salvatore

Paul Salvatore provides strategic labor and employment law advice to companies, boards of directors/trustees, senior executives and general counsel in such areas as labor-management relations, litigation, alternative dispute resolution, international labor and employment issues, and corporate transactions.

He negotiates major collective bargaining agreements…

Paul Salvatore provides strategic labor and employment law advice to companies, boards of directors/trustees, senior executives and general counsel in such areas as labor-management relations, litigation, alternative dispute resolution, international labor and employment issues, and corporate transactions.

He negotiates major collective bargaining agreements in several industries, including real estate and construction. Paul represents the NYC real estate industry’s multi-employer organization, the Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations (RAB), and its principal trade organization, the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY). In 2023, he helped the RAB reach a new collective bargaining agreement with SEIU Local 32BJ, covering 20,000 commercial building employees, enabling the industry to adapt its labor practices to tenants’ post-COVID utilization of office space, including that caused by remote/hybrid work.

Paul has long represented construction employers and developers, such as the Related Companies, Cement League, Association of Master Painters and others. He negotiates Project Labor Agreements (PLA’s), such as for Related (enabling the construction of Hudson Yards), and presently for Gateway Development Corporation (GDC) in building the New York-New Jersey train tunnels, the largest infrastructure project in America. City & State magazine has named him one of the most powerful lawyers in New York for his work in this sector.

Paul also tries arbitrations and litigations, and argues appeals, arising from labor-management relationships. He argued and won before the U.S. Supreme Court 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett. In a 5-4 decision of importance to employers, the Court held that a collective bargaining agreement explicitly requiring unionized employees to arbitrate employment discrimination claims is enforceable, modifying 35 years of labor law. Unions and employers now negotiate “Pyett clauses” in collective bargaining. He has argued and won federal circuit court cases reversing the National Labor Relations Board’s findings against employers, including in the D.C. and Fifth Circuits.

Paul represents universities and colleges in their labor and employment relations, including in the currently active areas of unionization and collective bargaining with graduate students, undergraduates, athletes and adjunct faculty. Among other schools he has worked with are Yale, Duke, Chicago, Washington University in St. Louis and Caltech. Paul pioneered innovative non-NLRB graduate student union election agreements at Cornell, Brown and Syracuse Universities.

An honors graduate of Cornell’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations (ILR) and the Cornell Law School, Paul served eight years on Cornell’s Board of Trustees, including on its Executive Committee. He subsequently was elected Trustee Emeritus and Presidential Councilor. He presently serves as a Trustee Member of the Board of Fellows of Weill Cornell Medicine, as well as on the Law School and ILR Deans’ Advisory Councils. In 2002, ILR awarded him the Judge William B. Groat prize, the school’s highest honor.

At Proskauer, Paul was elected to its Executive Committee and served as co-chair of its global Labor & Employment Law Department, named during his tenure by The American Lawyer and Chambers USA as one of the premier U.S. practices. He is widely recognized as a leading U.S. labor and employment lawyer in such publications as Chambers Global and USA (Band 1), and Legal 500 (“Hall of Fame”). The National Law Journal selected Paul as one of “The Decade’s Most Influential Lawyers” – one of only three in the labor and employment law field. His peers elected him to the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers.

An active speaker and writer on labor and employment law issues, Paul’s recent publications include “One Dozen Years of Pyett: A Win for Unionized Workplace Dispute Resolution” in the American Bar Association Labor & Employment Law Journal (“ABA Journal”), Volume 36, Number 2 at 257, and “The PLA Alternative in an Increasingly Open Shop New York City Construction Market: The REBNY-BCTC Statement of Principles,” Volume 37 ABA Journal, Number 3 at 415. He is an Adjunct Professor at Cornell Law School, teaching “Current Issues in Collective Bargaining.”

Photo of Joshua Fox Joshua Fox

Joshua S. Fox is a senior counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Sports, Labor-Management Relations, Class and Collective Actions and Wage and Hour Groups.

As a member of the Sports Law Group, Josh has represented several…

Joshua S. Fox is a senior counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Sports, Labor-Management Relations, Class and Collective Actions and Wage and Hour Groups.

As a member of the Sports Law Group, Josh has represented several Major League Baseball Clubs in all aspects of the salary arbitration process, including the Miami Marlins, Boston Red Sox, Los Angeles Dodgers, Kansas City Royals, San Francisco Giants, Tampa Bay Rays and Toronto Blue Jays. In particular, Josh successfully represented the Miami Marlins in their case against All-Star Catcher J.T. Realmuto, which was a significant club victory in salary arbitration. Josh also represents Major League Baseball and its clubs in ongoing litigation brought by current and former minor league players who allege minimum wage and overtime violations. Josh participated on the team that successfully defended Major League Baseball in a wage-and-hour lawsuit brought by a former volunteer for the 2013 All-Star FanFest, who alleged minimum wage violations under federal and state law. The lawsuit was dismissed by the federal district court, and was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Josh also has extensive experience representing professional sports leagues and teams in grievance arbitration proceedings, including playing a vital role in all aspects of the grievance challenging the suspension for use of performance-enhancing drugs of then-New York Yankees third baseman Alex Rodriguez. Josh also has counseled NHL Clubs and served on the trial teams for grievances alleging violations of the collective bargaining agreement, including cases involving use of performance-enhancing substances, domestic violence issues, and supplementary discipline for on-ice conduct. He has played a key role in representing professional sports leagues in all aspects of their collective bargaining negotiations with players and officials, including the Major League Baseball, National Hockey League, the National Football League, Major League Soccer, the Professional Referee Organization, and the National Basketball Association,.

In addition, Josh has extensive experience representing clients in the performing arts industry, including the New York City Ballet, New York City Opera, Big Apple Circus, among many others, in collective bargaining negotiations with performers and musicians, the administration of their collective bargaining agreements, and in grievance arbitrations.

Josh also represents a diverse range of clients, including real estate developers and contractors, pipe line contractors, hospitals, hotels, manufacturers and public employers, in collective bargaining, counseling on general employment matters and proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board, New York State Public Employment Relations Board and arbitrators.

Josh has also recently served as an adjunct professor at Cornell University’s School of Industrial Labor Relations for the past two years, teaching a course regarding Major League Baseball salary arbitration.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Josh worked for a year and a half at the National Hockey League, where he was involved in all labor and employment matters, including preparations for collective bargaining, grievance arbitration, contract drafting and reviewing and employment counseling. Josh also interned in the labor relations department of Major League Baseball and at Region 2 of the National Labor Relations Board. He was a member of the Brooklyn Law Review and the Appellate Moot Court Honor Society and served as president of the Brooklyn Entertainment and Sports Law Society.

Photo of Melissa C. Felcher Melissa C. Felcher

Melissa Felcher is an associate in the Labor and Employment Law Department and a member of the Labor Management Relations Practice Group and the Counseling, Training and Pay Equity Practice Group.

Melissa earned her J.D. at Brooklyn Law School, where she served as…

Melissa Felcher is an associate in the Labor and Employment Law Department and a member of the Labor Management Relations Practice Group and the Counseling, Training and Pay Equity Practice Group.

Melissa earned her J.D. at Brooklyn Law School, where she served as an Executive Notes Editor of the Brooklyn Law Review. While at Brooklyn Law School, she interned for the Honorable Gregory H. Woods of the Southern District of New York.