We have been tracking the ongoing challenges to the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB” or “Board”) power to issue enhanced remedies under Thryv, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 22 (2022). In Thryv, the Board held that employees aggrieved by an unfair labor practice (“ULP”) charge under the National Labor Relations
Taylor Arluck
Taylor Arluck is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Labor-Management Relations Group. Taylor represents unionized and non-unionized employers in all stages of labor-management relations and in proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board. Taylor’s practice focuses on representing employers in matters regarding unfair labor practices, union elections, collective bargaining agreements, work-stoppages, work-jurisdictional disputes, secondary boycotts, hot-cargo agreements, and labor arbitrations. Taylor has also provided labor and employment-law advice in corporate transactions and assisted in highly sensitive workplace investigations and trial preparation.
Taylor’s labor-management relations experience spans a variety of industries, including healthcare, entertainment, and media. Taylor’s work involves bargaining units of all sizes represented by labor organizations, such as SEIU, Teamsters, and CWA.
While in law school, Taylor interned for Region 29 of the National Labor Relations Board and published his law review note on federal labor law.
Before law school, Taylor worked for more than half a decade as a legal journalist at a subscription-based, legal news service based in New York City, where he covered labor and employment law. During that time, Taylor also attended night classes on labor relations.
As an undergraduate, Taylor worked as an intern for a major American metropolitan daily newspaper based in New York City.
Off the Rails? Union Asks Supreme Court to Rein in Fifth Circuit
We have been tracking the wave of constitutional challenges to the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB” or “Board”) structure and the divergent injunction standards emerging across circuits. (See here, here, here and here.)
In the latest development, on October 31, 2025, the Office and Professional Employees International…
Context Matters: Eighth Circuit Backs Home Depot’s Ban on BLM Apron Message Due To “Special Circumstances”
On November 6, 2025, the Eighth Circuit vacated and remanded a split decision from the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”), holding that the Board improperly rejected Home Depot’s “special circumstances” and business-justification defenses to banning an employee’s BLM message on a customer-facing apron.
We previously covered the factual…
Fifth Circuit Denies Enforcement of NLRB’s Enhanced Remedies, Widening Circuit Split
On October 31, 2025, the Fifth Circuit held that the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) impermissibly awarded compensatory damages to striking employees who were fired. As we reported here, the court’s ruling widens a circuit split between the Third and Ninth Circuits on available remedies under the…
Rejected: Ninth Circuit Denies Constitutional Attacks on NLRB
On October 28, 2025, the Ninth Circuit, in a unanimous, published decision, rejected three key constitutional attacks on the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”), some of which have gained favor in other circuit courts, making it harder—for now—for employers to challenge Board proceedings in that jurisdiction. This decision…
UPDATE: NLRB Files Suit Against California for Dramatically Expanding State Labor Board’s Powers to Cover Employees Under NLRB’s Exclusive Jurisdiction
On September 30, 2025, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law AB 288, which amends the state’s labor law and significantly expands the power of its Public Employment Relations Board (“PERB”) to cover private-sector employees currently under the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”).
Under…
Takeaways From Ninth Circuit’s Revival Of Trader Joe’s Trademark Infringement Suit Against Independent Union Over Labor-Branded Merchandise
The Ninth Circuit’s recent resurrection of Trader Joe’s trademark infringement suit over an independent union’s sale of apparel, mugs, tote bags, and other labor-branded merchandise that allegedly infringed the company’s intellectual property highlights key issues at the intersection of federal labor and IP law.
The case, Trader Joe’s Co. v.
Stepping Into A Void? New York Attempts to Extend New York State Labor Relations Act to Private-Sector Employers That Should Be Covered by National Labor Relations Act; NLRB General Counsel Sues Over Preemption Concerns
On September 5, 2025, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law what is dubbed an “NLRB Trigger Bill” amending the New York State Labor Relations Act. The statute itself is hardly a model of clarity, but its sponsors describe it as an effort to expand the jurisdiction…