Photo of Daniel H. Dorson

Daniel Dorson is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Labor-Management Relation Group. Daniel represents unionized and non-unionized employers in all stages of labor-management relations including union organizing campaigns, collective bargaining negotiations, contract administration, grievance arbitrations, work stoppages, and day-to-day labor relations issues. Daniel also represents employers in proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board including representation petitions, unfair labor practice charges, and compliance matters.

Daniel also has experience representing employers in federal court and before state and federal administrative agencies. He has defended employers against single plaintiff claims and class and collective actions alleging discrimination, harassment, and wage and hour violations.

While in law school, Daniel interned for the National Football League and the Arizona Coyotes. Prior to beginning his legal career, Daniel worked in football operations and administration for the Arizona Cardinals, Detroit Lions, Miami Dolphins, and Indianapolis Colts.

The Supreme Court’s June 29, 2026 decision in Trump v. Slaughter, No. 25-332 (2026), overruling Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), has major implications for the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). In a 6-3 decision, Chief Justice Roberts’s majority opinion held that for-cause removal protections

On June 10, 2026, the AFL-CIO filed suit against the Department of Labor (“DOL”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (AFL-CIO v. Sonderling, No. 1:26-cv-02061 (D.D.C.)), challenging a final rule that imposes “sweeping changes” to the financial reporting obligations of labor organizations under the

In a surprise move, on June 9, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Faster Labor Contracts Act (“FLCA”) by a vote of 230-193, sending the bill to the Senate.  The legislation—passed without Republican leadership support and via a discharge petition—seeks a dramatic restructuring of the National Labor Relations

On March 6, 2026, the Sixth Circuit issued its decision in Brown-Forman Corporation v. NLRB, marking the first appellate rejection of the National Labor Relations Boards’ (“NLRB” or “Board”) Cemex framework.  As previously reported, in August 2023, the Board issued Cemex, which upended 50 years of precedent

On February 19, 2026, the Eleventh Circuit upheld a 2024 National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB” or “the Board”) decision finding the now-defunct Southwest Florida Symphony Orchestra and Chorus Association prematurely declared an impasse in bargaining and unlawfully implemented its last, best, and final offer. A three-judge panel issued an

On February 27, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB” or the “Board”) General Counsel, Crystal Carey, issued General Counsel Memorandum 26-03 (“GC 26-03”), which provides directives to NLRB Regional Offices concerning unfair labor practice (“ULP”) case processing. Among other things, GC 26-03 encourages Regional Offices to be less aggressive